Kevin O’Leary: ‘What the hell is going on?’

0:00

‘The Five’ co-hosts discuss NY v. Trump as the jury begins deliberations for 34 charges against the former president.

Fox News
Fox News
A 24-hour all-encompassing news service dedicated to delivering breaking news as well as political and business news.

Latest stories

Ad

Related Articles

42 Comments

  1. So now the story is that Trump paid off Stormy Daniels to 'protect' his brand. Before, it was in order to 'protect' his family. I guess 'nobody' must believe that it was done to protect his chances in an election? Hmm… And on the subject of the 'American Brand', here are my thoughts: Having grown up in Sweden, I used to hold the USA and Americans in very high regard. But my view of the USA has changed a LOT since the 1980's. The damage that Donald Trump has done to the 'American brand' can not easily be estimated. How is it possible that almost half the American population are unable to see Trump for what he is – a grumpy old man who is a fascist, a dictator wannabe and an absolute f-n moron. Is maybe it because they watch Rupert Murdoch's Fakes News?

  2. This is the kind of stuff that some people are afraid of when they think of taking chances of creating a business,.
    They are afraid that Government will bankrupt them for being successful.

  3. "I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy, He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." -DJT

  4. I’ve done two write-ins for 2016 and 2020 as I didn’t like Trump, Biden or Clinton … but with the weaponization of our justice system by the Biden administration it’s imperative that we remove this corrupt administration that is putting our national security at risk…and I’ll be voting Trump 2024…

  5. I’m not a fan of Trump or Biden BUT the charges against him are basically him using $130K to silence Stormy Daniels because he wants to prevent potentially damaging information about himself from coming up during the election. The payment itself is not an issue it’s the reason the payment was made – the alleged intent to influence an election outcome. Secondly, the payments were misrepresented in his financial records which amounts to a second crime because it may have been used to cover up the first crime. This whole thing sounds dubious at best and frankly speaking by taking Trump to court – isn’t the Manhattan DA themselves trying to influence the outcome of an election? Which according to the original charges against Trump are a crime. So the Manhattan’s DA office is committing a crime? The whole things is sketchy and in my opinion should be thrown out.

  6. Im 75 and never voted in my life until i elected Trump, when Trump left office for Joe Biden this country went in the economic toilet and the open border treason is etrocious !! Wake up people, Democrats are viscious evil and hate America, a perfect example is over the top HATER Robert DeNiro.

  7. That's correct guys, I've been following it, and have no clue of what he's being charged with! I also heard even if he's found guilty he'll get like 12 months probation! ANyways, we all know this 7 year old case is just trying to slow down THE PRESIDENT TRUMP TRAIN!!! President TRUMP 2024!!! FJB!!! FJB!!! FJB!! And F DeNiro TOO!!! Cheers mates)

  8. Jeanine Pirro ignoring the obvious that the Judge gave both the Prosecutors and Defense the opportunity to bring the likes of Alan Weisselberg to testify. The Prosecutors did not think it was needed. Trump lawyers also did not think Weisselberg's testimony was needed. So, it is very strange for Trump to complain that Weisselberg did not testify, because his own lawyers did not think it was necessary…!!!

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here
Captcha verification failed!
CAPTCHA user score failed. Please contact us!
Ad
Continue on app