Home Politics Brett Tolman Reveals the Salacious Details Wanted by Trump’s Trial Judge

Brett Tolman Reveals the Salacious Details Wanted by Trump’s Trial Judge

47
Ad

0:00

Legal panelists Andrew McCarthy, Jonathan Turley, Kerri Kupec Urbahn and Brett Tolman join ‘America’s Newsroom’ to break down Stormy Daniels’ testimony and the possible impact on the criminal trial against former President Trump.

47 Comments

  1. So maybe somebody can help me understand how President Trump was trying to influence the 2016 election with a payment that he made to is lawyer at the time on 8/1/17 almost a year after the 2016 election 🤔🤔🤔 This is ground for dismissal off this fact alone💯 somebody please help me understand this‼️

  2. This is our tax money they're using to fund a witch hunt. I hope people realize this. Especially the tax payers in all the states they've filed a case.

  3. "A candidate under federal investigation "has no right to be running". Further, it would be "virtually impossible for (a president under indictment) to govern." Trump – Nov 2016

  4. I wonder how many boxes of Cracker Jack Judge Merchan had to open to secure his law degree . He certainly didn't pay attention in law school he's just a bottom of the barrel of a hack

  5. Why is Stormy speaking!? Trump cheated with her on Melania, tainted Presidential behavior, lied and hid from America during 2016 election. He PAID WOMEN (MANY WOMEN) TO SHUT THE F UP! He needs votes of "family" deciet to fool America.

  6. This video clip is way behind in what is happening in court. Her testimony has only been contradicted by Trump (the prolific liar). The judge admonished the defense attorneys for not objecting more. Stormy’s testimony has ended, body language indicates that the jury did not like the defense attorney’s questions in cross examination. Stormy’s testimony clearly hurt Trump, Trump was very upset and was cursing during her testimony. Judge had to reprimand the defense attorneys to control Trump.

  7. Trump’s alleged affair is NOT on trial here. The Court, itself, is allowing Stormy to violate the NDA that another Court has ruled as being legally binding. The hypocrisy and unconstitutionality of this proceeding is ridiculous.

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exit mobile version