After assuming office, President Joe Biden proclaimed, “Diplomacy is back,” signaling a shift from the previous administration’s unilateral approach. However, the execution of this diplomatic strategy by top aides Antony Blinken and Jake Sullivan left much to be desired.
Despite efforts to embrace traditional diplomacy, the Biden administration’s handling of key international crises was criticized for its lack of effectiveness. For example, the humiliation of a U.S. diplomat by Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev highlighted the weakness of American diplomacy under Biden.
Subsequent events, such as Azerbaijani attacks on U.S. projects and a military offensive, further showcased the administration’s inability to assert American interests effectively. While some symbolic gestures were made, such as aid packages and visits to memorials, the actions taken were seen as insufficient and misguided.
Criticism mounted as the administration’s response to Azerbaijani aggression fell short and failed to address key issues. The lack of a strong and decisive stance from the Biden team in the face of escalating tensions and human rights violations raised concerns among allies and adversaries alike.
In contrast, countries like France demonstrated a more assertive approach in response to Azerbaijani actions, emphasizing the importance of standing firm in the face of aggression. The Biden administration’s perceived lack of backbone in dealing with international challenges drew criticism and raised doubts about its ability to effectively pursue American interests on the global stage.
