Oregon Senator Ron Wyden has introduced a comprehensive bill aimed at reforming the Supreme Court, proposing the addition of six new justices and increased transparency measures.
The Judicial Modernization and Transparency Act, unveiled on Thursday, seeks to “restore balance among the three branches of government, increase transparency to improve public trust in America’s courts, and modernize the courts to ensure greater access to justice for more Americans.” The bill would also require Supreme Court justices to publicly disclose their tax returns, a move aimed at promoting accountability and transparency.
Wyden emphasized the need for bold action to address the current crisis of trust in the Supreme Court, stating that “more transparency, more accountability and more checks on a power hungry Supreme Court are just what the American people are asking for.”
The proposal comes on the heels of a similar call for reform by President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, who earlier this year expressed support for several Supreme Court reforms, including the addition of more justices and the implementation of term limits. Harris urged Congress to pass these reforms, highlighting the importance of trust in the Supreme Court for achieving equal justice under the law.
However, not everyone is convinced of the need for reform. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has expressed concerns about the potential impact of such changes, emphasizing the importance of an independent judiciary in protecting the rights of Americans. In an interview, Gorsuch cautioned against undermining the independence of the judiciary, arguing that it is essential for ensuring that individuals receive a fair hearing under the law, particularly when they are unpopular or facing government action.
The debate over Supreme Court reform is likely to continue, with Wyden’s bill sparking a renewed discussion about the role of the judiciary in American democracy. As the proposal makes its way through Congress, it is likely to face significant scrutiny and debate, with proponents arguing that it is necessary to restore trust in the Supreme Court and opponents warning of the potential risks to the independence of the judiciary.
