Leftist prosecutors in swing states are going after Trump supporters under the guise of fake elector charges as the Biden v. Trump 2.0 showdown is on the horizon. The media is supporting this legal battle every step of the way. However, the narrative of Trump and his allies using an alternate electors strategy to change the 2020 election results is facing pushback.
Arizona recently indicted 18 people, including Trump campaign attorneys and advisers, for their involvement in the fake electors scheme. This move is part of a trend where Trump allies are being targeted with criminal charges in several states.
The legal expert, Hans von Spakovsky, argues that the alternate electors strategy is not illegal and has historical precedent. Previous elections have seen similar actions from both parties without facing criminal charges.
Despite the efforts of leftist prosecutors, similar cases in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin have failed to hold up in court. Trump supporters involved in these incidents were simply trying to preserve Trump’s legal standing in case of a change in the election results due to ongoing legal challenges.
As the legal battles continue, there are concerns about the politicization of these cases and the potential bias against Trump and his allies. The media and Big Tech companies are also playing a role in shaping the narrative around these fake electors charges. The question remains: if similar actions were legal for Democrats in the past, why are they being deemed illegal for Trump and his supporters now?
