The Trump hush money trial prosecution plans to wrap up its case on Friday after Michael Cohen’s testimony. President Trump is an unusual defendant as he faces 34 violations of a New York business record-keeping statute. The charges relate to invoices, checks, and ledger entries involving payments to Michael Cohen.
The prosecution’s case hinges on proving that the records were false, made with intent to defraud, and with intent to conceal another crime. However, there are issues with the evidence presented. The alleged false records were made in Trump’s personal accounts, not his enterprises, and there is no evidence of intent to defraud. Additionally, the checks and ledger entries accurately reflect the transactions.
The prosecution has failed to specify the crime being concealed, and no evidence has been presented to support allegations related to federal election law, state election law, or federal tax law. The trial has essentially confirmed the well-known details of the Stormy Daniels payment saga.
Despite the prosecution’s efforts, the case appears weak due to a lack of relevant evidence. It is suggested that political motivations may be driving the pursuit of a guilty verdict. If Trump is convicted, appellate courts will likely focus on the law and evidence, potentially leading to a reversal of the conviction. However, this may not matter as the prosecutors aim to secure a verdict before the 2024 election.
