The Trump trial in Manhattan is reaching a crucial point with the testimony of key witness Michael Cohen, following Stormy Daniels’ testimony. Daniels claimed to have had a sexual encounter with Trump in 2006, leading to a $130,000 payment from Trump to keep quiet. The trial accuses Trump of falsifying bookkeeping to sway the 2016 election.
Both Daniels and Cohen have a strong bias against Trump, making it hard to trust their statements. Their history of animosity and questionable actions raises doubts about their credibility. The trial’s reliance on witnesses like Daniels and Cohen, who lack good character, reflects poorly on Trump.
Cohen’s public displays of anti-Trump sentiments, despite being a key witness, have caused concern in court. Daniels has also shown animosity towards Trump on social media. The trial’s focus on sensational details rather than substantive evidence raises doubts about its validity.
Despite challenges, the case relies heavily on Cohen’s credibility, which has been called into question due to his past lies and biases. The lack of concrete evidence against Trump raises doubts about the trial’s outcome. Ultimately, the case against Trump hinges on the testimony of a witness with credibility issues.
