Internal documents obtained through a public records request have shed light on a Missouri school district’s approach to supporting transgender students, sparking controversy over its handling of parent-student communication. The documents, released by Springfield Public Schools, outline a policy that allows staff to use different names and pronouns for students in various settings, including in class and at home.
According to the documents, school staff are advised to discreetly ask transgender students how they wish to be addressed in different contexts, including in correspondence with parents. While the student’s legal name remains on record, the district’s policy prioritizes using the student’s preferred name and pronouns in school settings.
Critics argue that this approach constitutes “deception” of parents, who may not be aware of the names and pronouns being used in school. Erika Sanzi, director of outreach at Parents Defending Education, condemned the policy, stating that it undermines parental authority and creates a power imbalance. “It’s always wrong to knowingly deceive parents,” she said. “Springfield Public Schools is essentially cutting parents out of the loop and giving children the authority to make decisions without their input.”
The district’s “Transgender Student Recommendations” document emphasizes the importance of respecting students’ gender identities and using their preferred names and pronouns. However, critics argue that this approach disregards parental rights and concerns. In cases where parents do not consent to the use of a child’s preferred name or pronoun, the district recommends that school counselors work with the student to develop a plan that balances the needs of the student and their family.
The controversy surrounding Springfield Public Schools’ policy has sparked debate about the role of parents in their children’s education and the district’s responsibility to support transgender students. The district’s guidance on transgender students and pronouns is outlined in several documents, including a 59-page manual on administrative practices and procedures. When contacted for comment, Springfield Public Schools did not provide a response.
