Was Fani Willis’ Indictment of Defendants Done Without Proper Jurisdiction?

0:00

A recent motion filed in the Fulton County case against Donald Trump and 18 others, known as “The Fulton 19,” has the potential to change the outcome of the entire case. One of the defendants, Harrison Floyd, a former marine and prominent figure in President Trump’s 2020 campaign, was indicted along with Trump by District Attorney Fani Willis for various charges related to election interference.

The case revolves around an incident where Floyd, seeking to help election worker Ruby Freeman clear her name amid allegations of election fraud, arranged for a meeting with her through a publicist. The meeting took place in the presence of the police, where Freeman expressed her desire to seek help and expose alleged misconduct during the 2020 elections.

After being indicted, Floyd surrendered himself in August 2023 and was unexpectedly denied bond by Magistrate Judge Emily Richardson. Following public outcry and a crowdfunding effort for his legal defense, Floyd was eventually granted a bond and released from jail.

Floyd’s attorney, Chris Kachouroff, has been pushing for disclosure of the alleged false statements Floyd was accused of soliciting from Freeman. Kachouroff also raised jurisdictional issues, arguing that the state election board should handle election-related violations, not the district attorney’s office.

Despite initial denial of his motion challenging Willis’ jurisdiction, Floyd was granted a review by the Georgia Court of Appeals. The outcome of this review could potentially invalidate the charges against Floyd and his codefendants, leading to legal repercussions for Willis and Fulton County.

Floyd maintains his innocence and hopes to shed light on the conditions in Fulton County jail, where he was held for a week. He also expressed gratitude for the support he has received and highlighted his efforts to combat legal issues through the “Statesmen Project.”

In conclusion, the case against Floyd and the other defendants remains in flux as legal challenges and jurisdictional disputes continue to unfold.

Mark Davis
Mark Davis
Mark Davis is president of Data Productions, Inc., and has been working with voter data since 1986. He has been qualified and admitted to testify as an expert witness on voter data analytics and residency issues in court cases involving disputed elections five times over the last 20 years.

Latest stories

Ad

Related Articles

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here
Captcha verification failed!
CAPTCHA user score failed. Please contact us!

Ad
Continue on app